HOME
CATHAR
BELIEFS
Basic
Tenets
Implications
Cathar
Believers
Cathar
Elect
Afterlife,
Heaven
& Hell
Other
Beliefs
Cathar
Ceremonies
Cathar
Prayer
The
Cathar Hierarchy
CATHAR
WARS
Albigensian Crusade
Who
led the Crusade ?
Crusader
Coats of Arms
Defender
Coats of arms
Medieval
Warfare
CATHOLIC
CHURCH
Cistercians
Dominicans
Franciscans
Cathars
on Catholics
Catholics
on Cathars
Catholic
Propaganda
"Kill
Them All ... "
Waldensians
Troubadours
CATHAR
INQUISITION
Inquisition
Inquisition
documents
CATHAR
CASTLES
Cathar
Castles
Cathar
Castle Photos
CATHAR
ORIGINS
Early
Gnostic Dualism
Manichaeans
CATHAR
LEGACY
Geopolitics
Historical
Studies
Popular
Culture
Catholic
Inheritance
Protestant
Inheritance
Cathar
Vindications
Do
Cathars still exist ?
CATHAR
TOURS
WHO's
WHO
The
Catholic Side
The
"Cathar" Side
Counts
of Toulouse
The
Cross of Toulouse
CATHAR
TIMELINE
Detailed
Chronology
MORE
INFORMATION
CATHAR
TERMINOLOGY
A
Cathar Glossary
|
Source Documents: Condemnation of Guillaume Guilabert of Montaillou
Introduction
Jacques Fournier, Bishop of Pamiers, created and conducted his
own Episcopal inquisition in the first quarter of the fourteenth
century. Questioning of those suspected (or "vehemently suspected")
of heresy usually took place in a chamber of his Episcopal palace
at Pamiers. He sat judicially alongside a Dominican Inquisitor
such as the Inquisitor for Toulouse or the Inquisitor for Carcassonne
for the most important events and in most cases a Dominican from
the local Convent in Pamiers deputizing for the Inquisitor of
Carcassonne. Also present were various witnesses - Archdeacons,
Priors, rectors, Cistercian monks, Dominican friars, jurists and
notaries. Notaries made notes in Occitan, and read them back in
the same language "the vulgar tongue" before rewriting
a final version in Latin. Witnesses were also questioned. None
of the accused here had legal representation, and so faced a panel
of legal experts - including one one of the finest canon lawyers
in Christendom - alone.
Inquisitors are interested in three things:
- Discovering and documented examples of "heresy" -
any deviation from Catholic teaching (in one notable case for
ridiculing the Catholic practice of placing a lighted candle in
the mouth of sick people expected to die). Failing to report heresy
was also an offense.
- Discovering the identities of other "heretics" -
those who had ever doubted any Catholic doctrine, who had associated
with known heretics, or had been present as heretical events such
as heretical preaching, Cathar baptisms ("heretication"),
Cathar ritual greetings ("adoration"), or Waldensian
ordinations.
- Discovering details that might help identify other heretics,
for example the Inquisitors are interested in what Baptized Cathars
wore (usually black, dark blue or dark green clothes and cloaks
with hoods) and where they meet.
Those accused were sometimes kept temporarily in a tower belonging
to the Bishop under the control of the Bishop's jailer. Some,
especially those facing more serious accusations were kept in
another prison at the Chateau des Allemans, where hearings also
took place. Sentences were read out at separate public events,
generally in a cemetery - either the cemetery of the Church of
Saint-Jean-Martyr in Pamiers or the cemetery of the Church at
Allemans. For a first offense fully admitted the accused might
be imprisoned at the Wall in Carcassonne, or given a penance such
as having to go on pilgrimage. They would also have to wear conspicuous
yellow crosses sewn into the front and back of their clothes.
For second offenses or first offenses where the accused refused
to acknowledge their supposed errors the penalty was death. Baptized
Cathars and Waldensians both refused to swear oaths and this was
itself sufficient to warrant death. Such "impenitent heretics"
were burned alive immediately in the graveyard immediately after
the sentence had been announced. There was no appeal.
Interrogation
date and place
|
|
14 January 1321 [1322],
Guillaume Guilabert of Montaillou
Bishop's palace of Pamiers
Jacques Fournier, Bishop of Pamiers
Gaillard de Pomiès, substitute for the Inquisitor
of Carcassonne,
Arnaud du Carla, of the order of Preachers of the convent
of Pamiers,
Bernard de Centelles, monk of Fontfroide
David, monk of Fontfroide
Guillaume Peyre-Barthe, notary
|
|
Proceedings Brought and Completed against
Guillaume Guilabert, a deceased heretic of Montaillou.
|
|
The year of the Lord 1321, the 14th of
January (January 14, 1322); since it has been discovered
by the depositions and avowals of certain persons made in
the matter of heresy, some of which were given before the
Reverend Father in Christ My Lord Jacques, by the Grace of God Bishop of Pamiers, and some before the venerable
and religious person Brother Jean de Beaune, Inquisitor
in the realm of France commissioned by the Apostolic See,
and more particularly of the Inquisition of Carcassonne,
that the late Guillaume Guilabert, son of Jean Guilabert
of Montaillou, was received and hereticated in the condemned
sect of heretics at the end of his days, and he died a condemnable
death in the same sect; my said Lord Bishop, wishing to
inquire concerning the said deceased boy as much in his
own name as in the name of my said lord Inquisitor, who
has given in a delegation to this effect, and to offer the
means of defense to the inheritors, neighbours and possessors
of the goods of the said late Guillaume, and generally to
all those who wish and are able in law to defend the said
Guillaume Guilabert, sent the same year and day as above
a letter of citation to these persons, who might wish or
be able in law to defend or excuse the said late Guillaume
Guilabert, to the rector of the church of Montaillou or
to his vicar, a letter of which the tenor is the following:
|
hereticated |
"Brother Jacques, by divine mercy
the Bishop of Pamiers, to the rector of the church of
Montaillou or to his vicar, eternal salvation in the Lord.
|
|
Since it has resulted from an inquest
made both by us and by the religious person Brother Jean
de Beaune, of the Order of Preachers, Inquisitor in the
realm of France in residence at Carcassonne, against the
heretics and their believers, helpers and defenders and
generally against all persons touched by the heretical
depravation, that the late Guillaume Guilabert of Montaillou
was received into the condemned sect of the heretics at
the end of his life and was hereticated and that he died
in a condemnable manner in this sect, as had been attested;
in virtue as much of our judicial authority as that of
the said Inquisitor delegated to us in its entirety and
in part, under pain of canonical sanctions that we wish
you to incur ipso facto by the fact of our present admonition,
if you do not do what we command you;
|
|
We command you as a strict order to
have cited for our part and at once, after you have read
this, credible witnesses, children, heirs, neighbours
and inheritors of the goods of the said late Guillaume
Guilabert, and generally all those who wish or can legally
defend the late above named Guillaume Guilabert, to appear
before us at our episcopal seat of Pamiers on Tuesday
in the octave of the feast of the Purification of the
Blessed Virgin Mary, the 5th of the Ides of February (9
February 1322) before tierce, there to speak and offer
all that they judge useful to reasonably offer to excuse
or to defend the said dead boy, and in any case there
to see and hear the publication of what has been discovered
against the said Guillaume Guilabert, and generally to
do what is necessary in the said affair, if they are judged
to have any interest in it; and telling them that, whether
they appear or not, we will proceed regardless in the
said affair conforming to the procedure, style and privileges
of the Inquisition, notwithstanding their absence.
|
|
You shall make public our present order
of citation as much in the house where the said late Guillaume,
his children, neighbours and heirs live or lived as well
as at the church, with the clergy and the people united
to hear the divine office on the Sundays and feast days
which intervene just until the said Tuesday; you will
make a public act of this citation, which you will send
to us before and including this said Tuesday;
! in faith of which we have judged it good to place our
seal on the present letters.
|
|
Given at our episcopal seat of Pamiers,
the 18th of January 1321 (1322).
|
|
The Rector, or his Vicar, wrote this
citation, as indicated by his seal placed on the back
of this letter of citation.
|
|
On the Tuesday of the octave of the Purification
of the Blessed Virgin Mary, appointed to the children, heirs,
neighbours and possessors of the goods of the said late
Guillaume Guilabert, and more generally assigned to all
those who might wish or be able by right to defend him,
no person appeared, who wished or could defend him, nor
did anyone bring anything in his defense, although such
defenses were waited for until the hour of tierce on the
said day, the hour fixed in the said letter of citation.
And these defenses were called for openly on the order of
my said Lord Bishop by Jacques Escudié, the porter
of My Lord the Bishop at the exterior door of the bishopric
of Pamiers three times, according to custom, in the presence
of the religious persons Brothers Gaillard de Pomiès
and Arnaud du Carla of the order of Preachers of the convent
of Pamiers. And since no one appeared, through the course
of the entire day, although my said Lord Bishop awaited
any and all persons for the entire day in his episcopal
seat of Pamiers. For this reasons they were declared in
default.
|
|
The tenor of the act of which mention
was made in the letter of citation is the following:
|
|
"The year of the Incarnation of
Christ 1321 (1322), with King Philip reigning. Let all
people know that My Lord Raimond Trilhe, a priest performing
the duties of curé of Montaillou, appearing in
the presence of myself, notary, and the witnesses below
before the heirs and the neighbours of the late Guillaume
Guilabert of Montaillou, has read and presented a letter
of the Reverend Father in Christ My Lord the Bishop of Pamiers, sealed with his seal, clearly visible on the
outside, of which the tenor is the following:
"Brother Jacques.......of the
inquest, made, etc.." (the present letter is inserted
above, and it is clear that it ought to be placed here
in the present citation.)
By the order and authority of these letters,
the said curé cited the said heirs and neighbours
to appear, the day, hour and place contained in this letter,
in person, before my said Lord Bishop, there to speak within
reason on the content of these letters; the said curé
requiring me, the notary below, to record the public act
of the publication and reading of these letters and these
citations.
|
|
Given at Montaillou, the Sunday after
the Feast of Saint Vincent the Martyr (24 January 1322).
Witnesses are: Philippe Castel, lieutenant of the châtelain
of Montaillou, Raimond Clergue and Pierre Rive de Montaillou,
as well as many other men of the said town.
|
|
And I Prades Ayméric, notary public
of the county of Foix, who has written and signed this charter.
(In the place of whom I, Jean Jabbaud,
clerk, have faithfully transcribed and corrected the original.)
|
|
After this, the following year, on the
18th of the month of February (18 February 1322) another
subsequent letter of citation was sent, by the special grace
of the Reverend Father in Christ My Lord Jacques, by the
Grace of God Bishop of Pamiers above said, and sealed with
his seal on the back of the letter, of which the tenor is
the following.
|
|
"Brother Jacques........notwithstanding
their absence." (identical text to the letter above)
|
|
Since the said children, heirs, neighbours
and possessors of the goods of the said late Guillaume
have not deemed it worthwhile to appear on this day, nor
to send anyone on their account, for this reason they
have been declared to be in default, and for these reasons,
since this time is the second time of default, we order
you to have these children cited and at once by special
grace......to appear before us at our episcopal seat of
Pamiers the Saturday after Ash Wednesday before tierce
(27 February
1322).....before the Saturday included....by the present
letter." (otherwise identical to text above).
|
|
Send these letters to the messenger
after your seal has been placed on them as a sign of this
mandate being received and accomplished.
|
|
Given in our above mentioned episcopal
seat, the 18th of February, the year of the Lord 1321
(1322).
|
|
The same Saturday after Ash Wednesday,
appointed to the children.....according to custom in the
presence of Masters Pierre Pasquier and Philippe Theulier,
notaries of Cintegabelle, and of me, Guillaume Peyre-Barthe,
notary of My Lord the Bishop abovenamed. And because of
this.....in default. (same formula as above.)
|
|
Before the day of Saturday before Ash
Wednesday, appointed in the letter of citation, the act
mentioned in this second letter was sent by Raimond Trilhe,
priest, an act of which the tenor follows:
|
|
In the year of the Incarnation of Christ
1321 (1322), King Philippe reigning. Let all know that
My Lord Raimond Trilhe....the witnesses below, before
Sibille, sister of the late Guillaume Guilabert and Martin
Guilabert her husband, who possess the goods of the said
Guillaume, of Bernard Marty, Arnaud Marty and Jean Fort,
cousins of the said Guillaume, of Bernard Faure, nephew
of the said Guillaume of Raimond Fort, Guillaume Argelier
and Isarn, his uncles of Montaillou, reading was given......citations.
|
Duvernoy's note: same redaction as the citation above,
with different witnesses.
This wealth of citations can only have one aim: to exhume
the bones of Guillaume Guilabert from the cemetery of Montaillou,
since he was designated the heir of his father, Jean Giulabert
before his death. Because of this fact, Jean's property
is liable for confiscation from the hands of his daughter
Sibille, who inherited it.)
|
Given at Montaillou the Monday before
the Feast of Saint Matthew Apostle (22 February 1322). Witnesses
are: Guillaume Capelle, Bernard Benet, Bernard Clergue,
Bernard Joulia, Jean Benet, Raimond Argelier and Pierre
Benet of Montaillou.
|
|
And I, Prades Malet of Prades, notary
public of the County of Foix, who has received and written
this charter.
|
|
After this, the same year as above, the
19th of March, I myself, Guillaume PeyreBarthe, notary of
my said Lord Bishop, was sent by him to the château
of Allemans, to know from Alamande, wife of Jean Guilabert,
and from Alazaïs, the wife of Arnaud Faure, of Montaillou,
imprisoned in this château for the crime of heresy,
if they wished to defend the said Guillaume, son of Alamande,
and brother of Alazaïs, of whom it was discovered that
he had been received and hereticated in the condemned sect
of heretics, and that he had died in a culpable fashion;
and to assign to the said women a certain date, if they
wished to defend the said dead man, before my said Lord Bishop, to the end of speaking there and proposing all that
they reasonably wished to excuse and defend the said dead
man, and to hear there the public reading of that which
had been discovered against him.
|
|
These women, present in the château
of Allemans where they were being detained, before me the
notary above mentioned and Raimond Gasc, Raimond Delbosc
and Arnaud de Larcat of Allemans, witnesses convoked for
this purpose, were interrogated by me about and concerning
the subject of all that precedes, responded that they did
not wish to defend the said dead man, nor propose anything
for this defense, nor to see or hear the public reading
of what had been discovered against him, because they were
aware that he had been hereticated at the end of his days,
as they had testified before My Lord the Bishop, but that
they submitted themselves on all of those points to the
wisdom of my said Lord Bishop, and asked, as they themselves
affirmed, that My Lord the Bishop do concerning these matters
that which justice would require.
|
|
After this, the year of the Lord 1322,
the 25th of May, since the parents, neighbours the possessors
of good and others persons who could have appeared to defend
and excuse the said Guillaume Guilabert, accused of having
been hereticated at the end of his life and of being a heretic,
cited two times (as customary) to appear on the days appointed
to them, have not believed that they ought to appear, even
though the citation has been made to them as the result
of the public act mentioned above and that the seal of the
curé or his vicar was placed on the letters of citation;
that after the day appointed to them just until today they
have not believed they ought to appear or defend the said
dead man, but on the contrary have responded that they did
not hear nor did not wish to defend or excuse him; by these
facts, my said Lord Bishop, proceeding with the publication
of testimonies against the said dead man, in the absence
of the above-mentioned persons who could or ought to defend
and excuse him by right, and of whom the default is now
equal to the presence, renders public the deposition of
witnesses received against the said Guillaume Guilabert
and orders them to be published. The same Lord Bishop concludes
the present case, considers it renounced and proceeds now
to the sentence.
|
|
Done the year, day and place as above,
in the presence and witness of the religious persons Brothers
Gaillard de Pomiès, substitute for My Lord the Inquisitor
of Carcassonne, Arnaud du Carla, O.P. of the convent of
Pamiers, David and Bernard de Taïx, monks of Fontfroide,
Master Guillaume Nadin, notary of My Lord the Bishop, and
of mister Guillaume Peyre-Barthe, rector of Vira, notary
of My Lord the Bishop in all causes concerning the Catholic
faith, on account of and by the wish of myself, Arnaud Raimond-Falcou,
cleric of Pamiers....in the place of whom I myself, Jean
Jabbaud, cleric of Toulouse, have faithfully transcribed
from the original and corrected all that precedes.
|
|
|
|
Duvernoy's Note:
The exhumation and cremation of the remains of Guillaume
Guilabert was ordered in a Sermon of 5 July 1322. (Hist.
Inquisitionis, p. 333). Ed. latin, II, p. 255-257.
|
|
Translation by Nancy Stork, San José State University -
to whom many thanks for permission to reproduce this text.
|