| HOME   CATHAR 
              BELIEFS Basic 
              Tenets  Implications Cathar 
              Believers  Cathar 
              Elect Afterlife, 
              Heaven 
              & Hell Other 
              Beliefs Cathar 
              Ceremonies Cathar 
              Prayer The 
              Cathar Hierarchy    CATHAR 
              WARS  
              Albigensian Crusade  Who 
              led the Crusade ?  Crusader 
              Coats of Arms  Defender 
              Coats of arms Medieval 
              Warfare   CATHOLIC 
              CHURCH Cistercians Dominicans Franciscans Cathars 
              on Catholics Catholics 
              on Cathars Catholic 
              Propaganda "Kill 
              Them All ... " Waldensians Troubadours   CATHAR 
              INQUISITION Inquisition 
             Inquisition 
              documents   CATHAR 
              CASTLES Cathar 
              Castles  Cathar 
              Castle Photos    CATHAR 
              ORIGINS Early 
              Gnostic Dualism Manichaeans   CATHAR 
              LEGACY Geopolitics Historical 
              Studies Popular 
              Culture Catholic 
              Inheritance  Protestant 
              Inheritance  Cathar 
              Vindications Do 
              Cathars still exist ?   CATHAR 
              TOURS   WHO's 
              WHO  The 
              Catholic Side The 
              "Cathar" Side Counts 
              of Toulouse The 
              Cross of Toulouse   CATHAR 
              TIMELINE Detailed 
              Chronology    MORE 
              INFORMATION   CATHAR 
              TERMINOLOGY A 
              Cathar Glossary | Source Documents: Interrogation of Jacqueline d'en Carot of Ax 
            Jacqueline doubted the Catholic doctrine of the bodily resurection 
              of the dead. This would have been enough to have her burned alive 
              as a heretic, if she had maintained her position.  She had the sense to affirm that her doubts had passed, and that 
              she now firmy believed in the doctrine. This, along with her fingering 
              others for another crime (practicing magical arts) would have been 
              enough to save her life.   
               
                | Witnesses against Jacqueline 
                  d'en Carot concerning the crime of heresy. |  |   
                | The year of the Lord 1319 and the 3rd 
                    of March. Barth�lemy de Lagleize, priest of Sorgeat, 
                    a sworn witness, interrogated against Jacqueline d'en Carot 
                    concrning the accusation of heresy: |  |   
                | About 12 years ago, I heard from a 
                    young girl, who lives with Pierre Rouch, the cur� of M�rens 
                    in his house at Ax, that during that year she was at the mill 
                    of My Lord the count one day, to see about getting some flour, 
                    and Jacqueline, who is called d'en Carot, was there to grind 
                    some grain. The said Jacqueline and Guillaume Caussou, who 
                    was also there, exchanged words and he said, "May God grant 
                    that we will see each other in the other world and be in Paradise!" 
                    And Jacqueline said then that men and women will never see 
                    each other again in the next world, and asked him if he himself 
                    believed it. He replied that he believed it, because the cur�s 
                    affirmed it to be so. And she said, swearing by the flour 
                    of the wheat, "There will never be another world but this 
                    one, and men and women who have died will never rise again." |  |   
                | Other than this, the said 
                  witness knew nothing, as he said, except for what he had heard 
                  reported by this girl. And he said nothing more concerning the 
                  said Jacqueline. |  |   
                | The same year and day 
                  as above, Guillaume Caussou, miller of Ax, a sworn witness and 
                  asked about that which precedes, said: |  |   
                | That year, after the assassination 
                    of Valentin Barra of Ax, in the cemetery of that same place, 
                    I was at the mill of My Lord the count one day, and Jacqueline 
                    d'en Carot and 4 other women whose names I have forgotten 
                    were present. We were tallking together of the tumult one 
                    could hear, they said, at night in the cemetery of Ax after 
                    the assassination of this Valentin, 
                    to the point that, out of fear, the cur�s did not dare to 
                    rest and sleep in that church at night. And we were wondering, 
                    amongst ourselved who were then in the mill, if men would 
                    know each other in the other world and if they would rise 
                    up at Judgement Day. And I said and affirmed that it would 
                    be so, because this was what the cur�s and clerics say and 
                    preach, and I myself believed it. |  |   
                | The said Jacqueline d'en Carot said 
                    in the mill to the 4 women present, when we were talking of 
                    this Valentin, "St. Mary, is it so, that when we are dead, 
                    we will recognize our fathers and mothers, and return from 
                    death to life, and rise up in the same bones and flesh that 
                    we have now?" She said this in such a way that she seemed 
                    to doubt it. Hearing this, I said "Indeed, we shall see, because 
                    I have heard thus from both the cur�s and the Friars Minor, 
                    and one finds it written in charters and books, as the cur�s 
                    say." Having said this, I left those women to go to the mill 
                    and I did not hear if the said Jacqueline said anything else. |  |   
                | Gaillarde, daughter of Pierre de 
                    Canals de Saurat, sworn witness 
                    and interrogated concerning the preceding, said: |  |   
                | The Thursday or Friday before Lent 
                    of this year (13-14 February 1320) I was staying at Ax, begging 
                    for my sustenance from door to door and I went from the mill 
                    with two wheels to the mill with three wheels, asking for 
                    flour. When I was in this mill, also there were Jacqueline 
                    d'en Carot of Ax and Guillaume Caussou the miller. They were 
                    talking together of the other world and Jacqueline said, and 
                    I heard it, that if one were dead, one remained 
                    so, and one would never rise up or come again, nor have flesh 
                    and bone, that no one after death would know his parents, 
                    friends or acquaintances. Guillaume said that, on the contrary, 
                    men would live again and rise in the same flesh and bones 
                    that they had before, saying he had heard it said by cur�s 
                    and everyone, except the said Jacqueline. The same Jacuqeline 
                    swore by the flour of the wheat which she took from the branteleria 
                    (unidentified part of a mill) with a half-quart measure (demi-quartaut, 
                    medio carterio), that men would never rise again in flesh 
                    and bone, nor live again, nor know one another after this 
                    life, but that when one was dead, one remained so. Guillaume 
                    said as well to this Jacqueline that she was speaking evil, 
                    and he had never heard anyone except her say this. That said, 
                    I left the mill. |  |   
                | Who was present? There was only myself, Guillaume and 
                    Jacqueline. Did you reveal this to anyone? The following Tuesday, I was at Pierre 
                    Rouch's shoue, the rector of M�rens, near whose house I was 
                    living; we were warming ourselves by the fire and the rector 
                    was talking with Barth�lemy de Sorgeat, vicar of Ax, about 
                    people condemned to wear the yellow cross. I asked these cur�s 
                    if what I had heard this Jacqueline say was true, and explained 
                    to them in deatil what she had said. They replied that it 
                    was not true, and that the church said otherwise. When it 
                    became known in the village that I had denounced her I was 
                    despised in the town. |  |   
                | Asked if in saying this, she had been 
                    moved by prayer, money, hatred, 
                    love or fear or if she had been induced or suborned, she said 
                    no, but only spoke for the sake of the truth. |  |   
                | Asked if she hated the said 
                  Jacqueline she said no. She said 
                  nothing else relevant. |  |   
                | Messire Pierre Rouch, rector 
                    of the church of M�rens, a sworn witness 
                    and diligently questioned, concerning the denunciations brought 
                    against the said Jacqueline, said: |  |   
                | The Thursday before Lent of this year 
                    I was in the town of Ax and later, because of the cold that 
                    persisted I remained there until the following Sunday when 
                    I celebrated Mass at Ax. I still remained there and the next 
                    day when the morning Mass was celebrated by Barth�lemy of 
                    Sorgeat, priest vicar of that church, we two went together 
                    to my house to get warm. And, in doing this, we fell to talking 
                    about those condemned to wear the cross, who were doing their 
                    penance badly. Barth�lemy said to me that these people marked 
                    by the cross did not have the appearance of true converts, 
                    but seemed to be of the same 
                    disposition they held previously. Gaillarde, a poor beggarwoman, 
                    who lived with me, heard these words and said, "Indeed, when 
                    Jacqueline d'en Carot, the other day was talking to Caussou 
                    the miller, in the mill, the miller said that men would rise 
                    again in the other world in the same flesh and bones that 
                    they had now and would know each other. She said to him that 
                    they would not rise again, and they would not know each other, 
                    but that whoever was dead, remained dead. The said Caussou 
                    contradicted her and said that the cur�s say the opposite 
                    of what she said. The said Jacqueline, who was just taking 
                    the flour from the branteleria , swore, putting her 
                    hand on the flour. "By this good thing, there will be no resurrection 
                    of the body and men will not know each other in the other 
                    world." |  |   
                | Did this girl tell you if there were 
                    any other people present when these words were spoken in the 
                    mill, with the exception of the two of which you just spoke? She said that no one was present, to 
                    her knowledge, but Jacqueline and Caussou. |  |   
                | And she said nothing else 
                  pertinent. |  |   
                | And I, Rainaud Jabbaud, 
                  cleric of Toulouse have faithfully transcribed this text and 
                  corrected it against the original. |  |   
                |     Confession of Jacqueline d'en Carot 
                    of Ax  |  |   
                | The year of the Lord 1319, the 4th 
                    of March. Since Jacqueline d'en Carot had been denounced for 
                    having said certain things against the Catholic faith, she 
                    was cited by letters from the Reverend Father in Christ My Lord Jacques, by the Grace of God, Bishop of Pamiers. The 
                    tenor of these letters is as follows: |  |   
                | Brother Jacques, by divine 
                  mercy Bishop of Pamiers, to our dear beloved in Christ, cur� 
                  of Ax or to his vicar, greetings in the Lord. |  |   
                | Because of likely cause and strong 
                    suspicion we suspect Pons Meriana and Jacqueline d'en Carot 
                    of heresy and since we wish and intend, as this concerns our 
                    office, to speak with them concnerning matters of faith, we 
                    command you to cite them, at 
                    once, to appear in person before us next Tuesday, that they 
                    may give a reasoned response and explanation of the preceding 
                    facts concerning the Catholic faith, and to tell them that 
                    if they do not appear before us on the appointed day, we will 
                    proceed against them as against those suspected of heresy, 
                    notwithstanding their absence. |  |   
                | Given at our episcopal seat, 
                  the Wednesday after the Feast of Saint Mathew the Apostle (26 
                  February 1320) the year of the Lord 1319. Sealed as a sign of 
                  execution of the mandate. |  |   
                | On the day mentioned in these letters, 
                    the said Jacqueline appeared before my said Lord Bishop, assisted 
                    by Brother Gaillard of Pomi�s, substituting for My Lord the 
                    Inquisitor of Carcassonne, and she was simply questioned without 
                    oath by My Lord the Bishop. He asked if she had ever, and 
                    particularly during this year, 
                    expressed doubt or spoken in a skeptical tone concenring the 
                    following proposition "that the dead will know each other 
                    in the next world, and the dead shall live again, and they 
                    will rise up in the same flesh and bones that they have where 
                    they are now" or if she had ever said and affirmed by oath 
                    that there is no other world, but the present one. |  |   
                | The said Jacqueline responded by denying 
                    everything. She also said she had 
                    never heard such things spoken of anywhere. |  |   
                | And my said Lord Bishop, wishing that 
                    she might reflect on the above, and reply after some deliberation 
                    gave her a reprieve until the following Thursday, at the hour 
                    of 3 o'clock (tierce), provided that in the meantime she would 
                    not leave the city limits of Pamiers and Mas-Saint-Antonin. 
                     |  |   
                | After this, the same year as above, 
                    the 7th of March, the day which was fixed above, the said 
                    Jacqueline appearing before my said Lord Bishop in the Bishop's 
                    Chamber took an oath to tell the truth purely and simply concerning 
                    the denunciations against her concerning the Catholic faith. 
                    She said that if it was true that she was in the mill of My Lord the count, she did not know if she had ever said, there 
                    or anywhere else, words resembling those of which she was 
                    accused. On the contrary she had never said that, and if she 
                    had said any words like those they were "May God grant and 
                    Saint Mary, that we may all know one another in the joy of 
                    Paradise!" She denied all the rest of the account above. |  |   
                | And since it was apparent that this 
                    Jacqueline had several witnesses against her, she was arrested 
                    by the said Lord Bishop who wished to seek the truth concerning 
                    the preceding. |  |   
                | After this, the year of the Lord 1320, 
                    in the month of April, the said Jacqueline, brought into the 
                    presence of my said Lord Bishop of the bishopric of Pamiers, 
                    was once again asked to tell more completely the truth concerning 
                    the denunciations brought against 
                    her. She said that she did not wish to say anything more, 
                    because she knew nothing more. My Lord the Bishop retained 
                    her still, because, it seemed, she had many witnesses against 
                    her. |  |   
                | After this, the same year as above, 
                    the 3rd of May, the said Jacqueline, appearing in the bishop's 
                    chamber before my said Lord Bishop, assisted by Brother Gaillard 
                    of Pomi�s, said and avowed, on 
                    faith of an oath taken preceding: |  |   
                | A year ago, Valentin Barra was assassinated 
                    in the cemetery of Ax and people in town said that one could 
                    hear a loud tumult in the cemetery where he had been assassinated, 
                    to the point that the cur�s did not dare to leave the presbytery, 
                    which was next to the cemetery, at night. One day, I don't 
                    remember exactly when, I went to the mill of My Lord the Count 
                    of Foix, who is in this town, to grind some grain and I ground 
                    it at the millstone of the mill. While doing this, Guillaume 
                    Caussou the miller and I spoke of the noise that one could 
                    hear in the cemetery where Valentin had been assassinated. 
                    And I said to him (in Occitan) "St. Mary! If we come again 
                    in flesh and bones will we then be in Paradise?"(Sancta Maria, 
                    si ja tornarem en carn e en ossa, mes puis que sirem en l'autre 
                    secle?) The miller said yes to me, and this, said, I left 
                    the hopper where I had been standing on one side and the miller 
                    on the other.  |  |   
                | Were there any further words between 
                    you and the miller concerning this matter? No. |  |   
                | Did you believe at any time and especially 
                    when you said "Sancta Maria, si ja tornarem en carn e en ossa, 
                    mnes puis que sirem en l'autre secle?", since you spoke in 
                    the form of a question, that there will not be a resurrection 
                    of the human body? No. |  |   
                | Have you ever doubted this? No. |  |   
                | Did you, after the miller responded 
                    to you in the affirmative, say that there will be no resurrection 
                    of the body, and did you swear this by the flour that you 
                    held' No.  |  |   
                | Have you ever heard anyone say that 
                    there will be no resurrection of the body? No. |  |   
                | Who was present when you said this? Myself, the miller, and a young beggarwoman 
                    who was among the sacks, whose name I do not know. |  |   
                | And since it seemed to My Lord Bishop 
                    that she was not speaking the plain truth, he asked her again 
                    to speak. She said that she would not say anything more. |  |   
                | After this, the same year 
                  as above, the 21st of June, the said Jacqueline, brought 
                  into the presence of my said Lord Bishop and Brother Gaillard 
                  of Pomi�s at the chateau of Allemans for questioning was interrogated 
                  by My Lord the Bishop concerning the witchcraft or "art of St. 
                  Gerorge" which it was said had been practiced in the solier 
                  (upper, half-timbered room) of her house at Ax by Berenger Gasc, 
                  notary of Tarascon, with herself consenting, having cognizance, 
                  giving aid and participating. She said and avowed what follows 
                  under an oath taken preceding: | There had clearly been some off-the record 
                    conversation here - presumably a deal by which Jacqueline 
                    can save herself by incriminating others |   
                | It was two years ago, near the Feast 
                    of St. Michael in September, it seems to me, that Arnaud Mondon 
                    of Ax, my son-in-law, had lost two woolen cloths at the fair 
                    at Foix, and he was very upset. One day he brought with him 
                    a cleric, whom my son-in-law said could see who had these 
                    cloths, because he knew certain "arts". And Arnaud asked 
                    me to go look for the daughter of Arnaud Pellicier of Ax because 
                    they wished to use this young girl in the "art", so that she 
                    could see who had these cloths. I left her with them and came 
                    down from the solier (upper room) because I did not 
                    wish to see them perform this "art". Shortly thereafter, my 
                    son-in-law Arnaud told me they had performed this "art". |  |   
                | Do you wish to say anything more concerning 
                    the heresy of which you are accused' No, I persist in my preceding deposition. 
                    During the time of that conversation between Guillaume and 
                    myself, which lasted as long as a stone flies when thrown 
                    from a man's hand, I doubted, and asked myself if men could 
                    return after death in the flesh and bones they had before. 
                    But I never at all believed that there would not be a resurrection 
                    of the human body. I doubted it and vacillated concerning 
                    this question. Did you ever doubt on any other occasions 
                    but this one?  No. Have you ever heard anyone say that 
                    there will be no resurrection of the body? No. My thoughts and my doubt arose 
                    from my stupidity and I said those doubting words because 
                    of the doubt I had in my heart. |  |   
                | Have you said then or later that there 
                    will be no resurrection of the body? No. |  |   
                | Now and since the time you spoke doubting 
                    words concerning the resurrection, as you yourself have said, 
                    or before the time when doubt arose in your heart, do you 
                    believe and have you believed firmly that men will rise again 
                    for universal Judgement in the same flesh and bones that they 
                    had when they were alive in this present life? Yes, well and firmly. |  |   
                | And she said nothing else 
                  of significance, although interrogated diligently. |  |   
                | And the above said Jacqueline, wife 
                    of the late Raimond d'en Carot, abjured all heresy, belief, 
                    complicity, defense, reception and apology for the sect, the 
                    life and the faith and all other participation in heresy or 
                    with heretics, by whatever names they may be called, and especially 
                    the heresy that denies the resurrection of the human body 
                    after death, and that which says that men will not rise again 
                    in the same flesh and bones in which they existed and lived 
                    in the present life, a heresy into which she fell by doubting, 
                    as she avowed. She swore also to hold and preserve the Catholic 
                    faith which the sacrosanct Roman Church holds, teaches and 
                    preaches and that she herself and through others would pursue 
                    heretics, their believers, deceivers, defenders, aiders, abetters, 
                    intermediaries and friends, as well as fugitives for heresy, 
                    and seek them out, arrest, denounce, bring forth and turn 
                    them over to our power, or that of our successors and that 
                    of the Inquisitors, or that she will have them brought forth 
                    and turned over by others according to her means. Moreover 
                    she swore to follow and obey the orders of the Church, to 
                    ours and those of our successors or the Inquisitors and to 
                    do and fulfill all penance, punishment, satisfaction or charge 
                    which we ourselves, the Inquisitors or our successors may 
                    judge good to enjoin or impose upon her. She swore also in 
                    the future that she would no longer use witchcraft, sorcery 
                    nor to frequent the casters of lots, sorcerers and diviners, 
                    and if she knew any she would denounce them to my said Lord Bishop and that she would accomplish her penance for what 
                    she had done. |  |   
                | And she asked for absolution from the 
                    sentence of excommunication under which she had fallen by 
                    reason of the above reported facts and was absolved 
                    by my said Lord Bishop, if indeed she had completely and fully 
                    avowed, as much conerning herself as others, and if she repented 
                    of them. Without this it was not the intention of the bishop 
                    that she be absolved. |  |   
                | After this, the same year as above, 
                    the 7th day of March (7 March 1321) the said Jacqueline, cited 
                    and appearing for questioning before my said Lord Bishop and 
                    the religious My Lord Brother Jean de Beaune, Inquisitor of 
                    the kingdom of France named by the Apostolic See in the chamber 
                    of the bishop's palace, attested and avowed under the faith 
                    of an oath taken previously that the summary of her confession, 
                    which was read to her clearly 
                    and in the vulgar tongue was indeed the confession made by 
                    her before My Lord the Bishop as contained above, and that 
                    it was true in fact and contained the truth, and that she 
                    wished to hold and persist in the said summaries, confession 
                    and deposition, nor ever to oppose it, nor to propose any 
                    defenses by which this summary, confession and deposition 
                    could be broken or made void in any way. And she submitted 
                    herself to the will and mercy of the said lords bishop and 
                    Inquisitor and renounced and concluded the present affair. |  |   
                | And the said lords bishop and Inquisitor 
                    assigned her a day to hear the definitive sentencve concerning 
                    the facts of her avowals, the following 
                    Sunday, the 8th of the Ides of March (8 March 1321) in the 
                    house of the Preaching Friars of Pamiers. |  |   
                | Written the same year and day as above, 
                    in the presence of My Lord Germain de Castelnau, archdeacon 
                    of the church of Pamiers, of Brothers David, monk of Fontfroide, 
                    Bernard de Centelles, monk of the same order, and Arnaud 
                    du Carla of the order of Preachers of the convent of Pamiers, 
                    and of us Guillaume Peyre-Barthe and Barth�lemy Adalbert, 
                    notaries, who have received the above mentioned. And I, Guillaume 
                    Peyre-Barthe, notary, have written all that precedes. |  |   
                | And I, Rainaud Jabbaud, cleric of Toulouse, 
                    on the order of my above said Lord Bishop have faithfully 
                    corrected the above confession against the original.  |  |   
                |  |  |      
 Translation by Nancy Stork, San José State University - 
              to whom many thanks for permission to reproduce this text.         NOTES   |